The Brussels Desk · IndependentBrussels desk
ParliamentSaturday, 12 September 2026 · 2 min read

A Group of 25 MEPs Demands the EU Mobilise Frozen Russian Assets for Ukraine

Lawmakers push European institutions to move past asset revenues and leverage immobilized state funds directly.

By Clara Fontaine · Filed Saturday, 12 September 2026 · Last updated 14:45 CET

Share

What happened

A group of 25 Members of the European Parliament has formally called on the European Union to mobilize frozen Russian state assets to support Ukraine. The appeal targets the billions of euros in Russian central bank reserves currently immobilized within EU financial depositories following sanctions. While European leaders have previously agreed to channel the windfall interest accrued from these frozen funds toward Ukrainian defense and reconstruction, the 25 signatories are pressing Brussels to take a bolder step by making direct use of the immobilized assets themselves.

Why it matters

For citizens across member states, the debate over Russian assets centers on how Ukraine's support and eventual reconstruction will be funded. To date, Western aid has relied significantly on national budgets and public borrowing. Utilizing sovereign Russian assets directly would provide substantial financial backing for Kyiv without imposing additional costs on European taxpayers. However, member states have proceeded carefully due to concerns over legal precedent, sovereign immunity, and the stability of the euro as a reserve currency.

The Brussels angle

In the daily life of the EU bubble, parliamentary letters are a primary tool for applying institutional pressure. While the European Parliament approves budgets and debates policy, it does not possess the legal power to initiate sanctions or seize foreign assets—decisions that belong entirely to the Council, where all 27 member state governments sit, working alongside the European Commission. By assembling a joint call, these 25 MEPs are trying to shift the agenda, signaling to executive policy-makers that legislative support exists for more decisive legal measures.

What happens next

The letter puts additional political pressure on the European Commission and national leaders as they continue evaluating sanctions frameworks. Any actual proposal to unlock or repurpose the principal assets would require a solid legal mechanism drafted by the Commission and agreed upon by member states. In the coming weeks, MEPs will look to see if their initiative prompts formal responses from executive officials or gains broader traction across parliamentary committees.

frozen assetsukrainesanctionseuropean parliamentmeps

Written from these sources

Facts are extracted from primary institutional material and written independently by The Gazette desk.

Parliament Correspondent · European Parliament

Clara Fontaine

Clara Fontaine reports on the European Parliament, its committees and its coalition arithmetic. She counts votes for a living and still occasionally wins.

More from Clara Fontaine →

The Brief

Brussels, decoded, every morning. What happened, what it means, one good dry joke.