Annual Assessment: EU Report Tracks Further Erosion of Freedoms in Hong Kong
The European Commission and the High Representative deliver their 28th review of the territory to MEPs and national governments.
By Aldo Verheyen · Filed Wednesday, 23 September 2026 · Last updated 05:00 CET
What happened
The European Commission and the EU’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs have released their 28th annual report on Hong Kong, concluding that fundamental freedoms in the territory continued to deteriorate throughout 2025. Sent jointly to the European Parliament and the Council of the EU—the body representing the 27 member state governments—the document provides the bloc’s official accounting of political and economic developments over the past calendar year. The assessment records a sustained slide in civil liberties and political autonomy, continuing a trajectory the EU has formally tracked for nearly three decades.
Why it matters
For European companies, investors, and residents operating in or trading with Hong Kong, these official reviews act as an institutional barometer for legal predictability and operational risk. When the EU formally notes a decline in basic freedoms, it signals to the international business community that the legal and regulatory landscape is growing less predictable. For ordinary citizens across Europe, the exercise demonstrates how the EU attempts to hold foreign powers to account: by establishing a clear, official record of rights violations, even when direct legislative power stops at the bloc's external borders.
The Brussels angle
Annual reports are a staple of Brussels diplomacy, offering the executive a structured way to keep delicate geopolitical matters on the record without immediately triggering a major diplomatic confrontation. The High Representative and the Commission compile these reviews to give all 27 member states a shared set of facts, preventing individual capitals from working off different scripts. In the quiet machinery of EU foreign policy, producing a 28th consecutive edition of a report is a classic institutional compromise: it ensures the issue remains visible, while proving that if Brussels cannot always change a foreign government's trajectory, it can certainly write down what happened.
What happens next
The report now moves to the European Parliament and the Council of the EU for detailed examination by lawmakers and national diplomats. While an annual audit does not automatically trigger immediate policy changes or sanction packages, it establishes the factual baseline that member states will rely on when negotiating future trade policy, diplomatic responses, and bilateral relations with China.
Written from these sources
Facts are extracted from primary institutional material and written independently by The Gazette desk.
Brussels Correspondent · European Commission
Aldo VerheyenAldo Verheyen is The Gazette's Brussels Correspondent, covering the European Commission, its College and the art of the leaked draft. He has reported from the Berlaymont since 2019 and translates proposals into plain English before they become law.
More from Aldo Verheyen →The Brief
Brussels, decoded, every morning. What happened, what it means, one good dry joke.