Deadline Drift: France and Italy Push Back on 2026 EU Budget Schedule
António Costa wanted leaders to lock in the long-term budget by the end of 2026. Rome and Paris are in no rush.
By Katarzyna Wisniewska · Filed Wednesday, 14 October 2026 · Last updated 13:20 CET
What happened
European Council President António Costa’s plan to seal a deal on the European Union’s next multi-year budget by the end of 2026 has run into immediate resistance from two of the bloc’s heaviest hitters. Both France and Italy are pushing back against the tight calendar, effectively weakening the end-of-year target before negotiations have fully hit their stride. The friction leaves Costa facing an uphill battle to keep 27 national capitals moving at the same pace on one of the most contentious dossiers in EU politics.
Why it matters
The multi-year budget sets the financial blueprint for the EU over seven years, determining how hundreds of billions of euros are spent on everything from agricultural subsidies and regional development to green initiatives and research programmes. For ordinary citizens, businesses, and local governments, late budget deals risk delays to funding streams and projects on the ground. When member states stretch out the calendar, it is rarely about administrative convenience; taking more time allows individual capitals to maximize their leverage and fight over how much money they pay into the shared pot and what they get in return.
The Brussels angle
In Brussels, setting an aggressive deadline is the standard institutional lever used to force national governments to stop posturing and start compromising. The European Council President—whose primary role is to chair summits and broker deals among the 27 EU heads of state and government—relies on calendar pressure to convert irreconcilable national positions into an acceptable joint text. By pushing back on the target date so early, Paris and Rome have effectively defused that pressure. In institutional negotiations, a country willing to let the clock run down is sending a clear signal: it would rather drag out the process than accept an unsatisfactory compromise. It is classic EU procedural theatre, reminding the summit chairman that while he sets the agenda, the capitals hold the purse strings.
What happens next
Diplomatic talks among member states and the European Council presidency will continue, though the formal timeline for a final political agreement remains uncertain. Leaders are set to revisit the budget framework at upcoming European Council summits, where the battle over the schedule will run parallel to disputes over the actual figures.
Written from these sources
Facts are extracted from primary institutional material and written independently by The Gazette desk.
Correspondent, The Brussels Bubble · Bubble politics and manoeuvring
Katarzyna WisniewskaKatarzyna Wisniewska writes The Brussels Bubble: the rivalries, leaks, coalitions and diplomacy practised off the record in and around the institutions.
More from Katarzyna Wisniewska →The Brief
Brussels, decoded, every morning. What happened, what it means, one good dry joke.