Merz Warns of Escalating Russian Hybrid Tactics While Pledging Continued Aid to Kyiv
The German political leader cautions that Moscow's shadow war against European infrastructure will intensify alongside traditional battlefield operations.
By Clara Fontaine · Filed Friday, 2 October 2026 · Last updated 15:15 CET
What happened
BRUSSELS — Friedrich Merz has delivered an explicit warning that Europe must brace for a surge in Russian hybrid attacks, even as he reaffirmed staunch political and material support for Ukraine. Speaking as Western allies evaluate their long-term security posture, Merz pointed to Moscow's growing reliance on non-conventional warfare—a tactic that spans cyber intrusions, disinformation campaigns, and infrastructure sabotage designed to destabilise European states without triggering direct military conflict. By coupling a commitment of sustained support for Kyiv with a stark assessment of domestic vulnerabilities, Merz highlighted the dual front facing European capitals: maintaining military supplies to the frontline while shielding domestic networks from covert disruption.
Why it matters
For ordinary citizens across Europe, hybrid warfare is no longer an abstract term confined to intelligence briefings. It manifests in real-world disruptions to critical services, from airport navigation systems and energy grids to digital banking and public communications. When political leaders warn of increased hybrid activity, it signals potential shifts in government spending toward cybersecurity, physical infrastructure protection, and civil defence readiness. It also serves as a reminder that supporting Ukraine's defence carries indirect consequences at home, where public resilience against foreign interference and digital manipulation is tested daily.
The Brussels angle
In the EU capital, warnings about hybrid threats usually trigger a familiar institutional dance between national capitals and EU agencies. While defence against covert operations and domestic security remain strictly national competencies—meaning individual governments hold ultimate authority—Brussels has spent years assembling joint response mechanisms, such as the EU's Hybrid Toolbox and coordinated cyber-defence frameworks. In practice, member states frequently prefer to keep sensitive intelligence to themselves while asking Brussels to standardise security protocols, creating a dynamic where the EU is expected to coordinate a defense against threats that national capitals prefer not to detail in public.
What happens next
European defence policy makers and intelligence officials will continue to refine joint threat assessments and operational response capabilities ahead of upcoming security summits. National governments are expected to bolster investment in critical infrastructure resilience and digital defences while maintaining military aid pipelines to Kyiv. As hybrid incidents increase in frequency, pressure will grow on EU institutions to streamline intelligence-sharing protocols, though any meaningful integration will depend on the willingness of national capitals to share sensitive security data.
Written from these sources
Facts are extracted from primary institutional material and written independently by The Gazette desk.
Parliament Correspondent · European Parliament
Clara FontaineClara Fontaine reports on the European Parliament, its committees and its coalition arithmetic. She counts votes for a living and still occasionally wins.
More from Clara Fontaine →The Brief
Brussels, decoded, every morning. What happened, what it means, one good dry joke.