Mind the Crypto Gap: ESMA Asks Brussels to Update Its Flagship Digital Asset Rules
The EU's financial supervisor wants the Markets in Crypto-Assets framework updated to catch fast-moving services that risk outpacing the law.
By Katarzyna Wisniewska · Filed Friday, 2 October 2026 · Last updated 16:10 CET
What happened
BRUSSELS — The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is calling for targeted changes to the EU's landmark Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation. The Paris-based financial watchdog wants rulemakers to adapt the framework to cover newly emerging crypto services that have developed since the original legislation was drawn up. MiCA was designed to bring digital token issuers and crypto platforms under unified European supervision. However, rapid shifts in business models and novel digital financial products have exposed areas where existing statutory definitions risk falling behind the market.
Why it matters
For crypto firms operating across the single market, regulatory updates signal that launching novel products into legal grey zones will become increasingly difficult. For consumers and investors, broader coverage under MiCA is intended to ensure consistent protections against platform failures, opaque token structures, and market manipulation. Drafting comprehensive EU legislation takes years, whereas digital financial engineering can happen in weeks. If the rules fail to cover emerging services, investors could assume a product carries full regulatory backing when it actually sits outside supervised boundaries.
The Brussels angle
This is a classic Brussels dilemma: spending years negotiating rules detailed enough to police complex markets, only to discover the market has redecorated by the time the text reaches the Official Journal. ESMA is the technical authority charged with making sure financial rules work on the ground, but only the European Commission holds the legal initiative to propose updates to EU law. By publicly highlighting where MiCA falls short on emerging services, ESMA is giving the Commission a polite institutional nudge, ensuring technical gaps are flagged before supervisory blind spots turn into public headaches.
What happens next
Any official adjustments to MiCA must pass through the EU's standard legislative process. The European Commission will assess ESMA's technical feedback before deciding whether to table a legislative proposal. Should the Commission move forward, the draft text will go to the European Parliament and the Council of the EU—representing the 27 member states—where ministers and lawmakers must negotiate a final compromise text. In the interim, national financial authorities will enforce MiCA's existing rules while monitoring unregulated edges of the market.
Written from these sources
Facts are extracted from primary institutional material and written independently by The Gazette desk.
Correspondent, The Brussels Bubble · Bubble politics and manoeuvring
Katarzyna WisniewskaKatarzyna Wisniewska writes The Brussels Bubble: the rivalries, leaks, coalitions and diplomacy practised off the record in and around the institutions.
More from Katarzyna Wisniewska →The Brief
Brussels, decoded, every morning. What happened, what it means, one good dry joke.