The Brussels Desk · IndependentBrussels desk
EU PoliticsFriday, 16 October 2026 · 2 min read

Russia Seizes Five More European Businesses Left Behind After 2022

A new decree takes control of packaging, flooring, and hygiene subsidiaries that stayed behind.

By Clara Fontaine · Filed Friday, 16 October 2026 · Last updated 13:55 CET

Share

What happened

Moscow has seized five more European-owned commercial operations by presidential decree, tightening state control over foreign businesses that remained in the country after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

The newly targeted assets span everyday industrial sectors: a flooring manufacturer, a paper packaging company, a producer of personal hygiene goods, and two metal and plastic packaging businesses. None had exited the Russian market following the outbreak of the war, attempting instead to maintain operations through years of mounting geopolitical friction and regulatory hostility. Under the decree, the state takes operational authority away from their European owners.

Why it matters

For European companies, the seizures deliver a blunt operational reality check. In the immediate aftermath of February 2022, corporate boards divided into those that swallowed immediate write-downs to pull out, and those that calculated they could navigate local market demands quietly from the factory floor. Moscow’s steady absorption of remaining assets underscores that keeping a low profile offers little shielding once administrative levers are pulled.

For citizens and investors across the bloc, the ongoing expropriations mean more balance-sheet write-offs, reduced commercial recovery prospects, and a total rupture of remaining supply chains in mundane, everyday consumer goods.

The Brussels angle

Inside the Brussels machinery, the expropriation pattern is viewed with grim, if predictable, familiarity. For two years, EU institutions and member states have wrestled with the knotty legal mechanisms surrounding frozen Russian sovereign assets parked in Europe, while Moscow demonstrates that property rights at home can be reallocated with a single signature.

Commission officials tasked with sanctions enforcement have repeatedly warned European firms about the escalating hazards of maintaining assets on Russian territory. The legal reality is that once an entity is seized by local decree, the bloc’s standard trade and commercial remedies offer virtually zero traction against decisions taken behind the Kremlin walls.

What happens next

The five affected subsidiaries will be folded under Russian state-appointed management structures, severing parent companies in Europe from cash flows, operational oversight, and factory control. For the European executive and member-state capitals, the move further narrows what little commercial overlap remained with Russia, reinforcing that remaining inside the market carries an eventual exit price dictated entirely by Moscow.

russiasanctionscorporate assetsukraine war

Written from these sources

Facts are extracted from primary institutional material and written independently by The Gazette desk.

Parliament Correspondent · European Parliament

Clara Fontaine

Clara Fontaine reports on the European Parliament, its committees and its coalition arithmetic. She counts votes for a living and still occasionally wins.

More from Clara Fontaine →

The Brief

Brussels, decoded, every morning. What happened, what it means, one good dry joke.