The Brussels Desk · IndependentBrussels desk

Strategic Sectors & Industrial Policy

Special Reports | Autumn 2026 Edition

Orchestrating the Grid: Why Energy Policy Is Now Europe's Core Industrial Strategy

Diederik Peereboom on investment certainty, grid technology and Europe's industrial security.

With Diederik Peereboom, Secretary General of T&D Europe

By Aida Iordache · October 29, 2026

Diederik Peereboom, Secretary General of T&D Europe

The European Union’s ambition to double its rate of electrification by 2040 has fundamentally shifted the baseline of continental strategy: energy policy is no longer an isolated regulatory dossier, but the core architecture of European industrial survival and economic security. While political ambitions demand a massive, multi-billion euro expansion of transmission and distribution networks, the technology providers tasked with manufacturing this critical infrastructure face acute market fragmentation, volatile supply chains, and regulatory asymmetries that threaten domestic competitiveness. To build a resilient, fossil-free grid, Brussels must move past abstract targets and secure a predictable, long-term investment framework that treats Europe's clean electricity technology base as a vital national security interest.

To dissect these infrastructural bottlenecks and the shifting dynamics of cross-border procurement under upcoming frameworks like the Industrial Accelerator Act, The Gazette sat down with Diederik Peereboom, representing T&D Europe.

As the primary institutional voice for Europe’s electricity transmission and distribution equipment manufacturers, Peereboom maps the critical prerequisites for grid modernization, the unintended costs of provisional trade safeguard measures on transformer steel, and the value-chain orchestration required to protect Europe’s technology base from external dependencies.

Share

The Interview · 1

The Gazette: Accelerating Grid Infrastructure Investments: Moving Europe's energy transition forward requires a massive expansion of the electricity transmission and distribution networks. From T&D Europe’s perspective, what primary EU regulatory updates and financing frameworks are most critical to unlocking the multi-billion euro capital investments needed for grid modernization?

Diederik Peereboom: As technology providers T&D Europe members depend on concrete demand signals from grid operators. For Europe’s clean electricity technology sector it is important to have visibility on the future demand for their products and services. Without such visibility it is very difficult to start planning investments in manufacturing for hardware and development capacity for digital products. Network development plans should be clearly aligned with the National Energy and Climate Plans for all voltage levels and accompanied by industrial plans, specifying the demand from network operators for grid technology. This will enable the industry to make the business case with a competitive return on equity to add capacity, to organise its supply chain and to recruit and develop the necessary skills. Over the past 2 years, the 12 corporate members of T&D Europe alone have publicly announced EUR 12 billion in investments to expand their manufacturing capacity globally.

The Interview · 2

The Gazette: Securing European Technology Competitiveness: European grid technology manufacturers operate in a highly competitive global market while facing stringent internal mandates. What industrial policy levers and economic security benchmarks must the Commission prioritize to ensure a level playing field for domestic grid equipment suppliers?

Diederik Peereboom: Electricity networks are a critical infrastructure and, as such, the backbone of Europe’s economy. This will be even more the case with the EU’s ambition to double the rate of electrification by 2040. To build, modernise and maintain this infrastructure, a strong domestic industry is critical. Therefore, European Parliament, Governments, and the European Commission should qualify Europe’s grid technology sector as a vital European and national interest. Europe needs to have a strong industrial base that can supply and support the electricity system as a critical infrastructure. It should thus take the right measures to enable the sector to continue to operate, deliver, innovate for a secure, reliable, flexible, and resilient electricity network.

This means on the one hand avoiding additional new barriers to the competitiveness of the sector. An example is the provisional safeguard measures that the Commission recently adopted on the imports of transformer steel (GOES), which results in higher costs for EU manufacturers, while providing for additional revenue to Asian steel manufacturers. Such measures not only reduce the competitiveness of European companies in the internal market, they also weaken the European position in export markets. On the other hand, the EU needs to support Europe’s strong technology sector by for example adding grid technologies to the scope of the Industrial Accelerator Act and by ensuring that under the Public Procurement Act long-term contracts remain possible for transmission and distribution technologies.

This also requires policymakers to ensure that the ambitions and the pace of the transition is in line with Europe’s industrial manufacturing and software development capacities to avoid the creation of new, undesirable external dependencies. Europe needs to support Europe-based manufactures and software developers in strengthening the domestic production of strategic grid technologies.

The Interview · 3

The Gazette: Navigating Supply Chain Bottlenecks: Supply chain constraints, from raw material procurement to long permitting timelines, continue to delay fast-moving grid integration. How must public affairs and corporate advocacy strategies evolve to effectively align national energy roadmaps with Brussels' overarching industrial ambitions?

Diederik Peereboom: What we need is a value chain approach for electricity infrastructure. The entire chain from the political ambitions to electrify and decarbonise, through distribution and transmission system operators into the supply chain, together with the current and future users of the infrastructure, need to work together to give as much visibility and certainty as possible.

A lot of progress has been made. The Grids Action Plan has resulted in much closer cooperation among TSOs, DSOs and manufacturers. More can and needs to be done. Making better use of existing frameworks, such as NECPs, is one way. Insisting on getting more out of existing infrastructure by making more and better use of digitalisation is another. Moreover, we need to approach the electricity system as a system, including transmission and distribution, and involving the users more closely. It is important to make sure that some of the major Commission initiatives, such as the IAA and the Public Procurement Act, reflect on their impact on the business case for actors in the electricity eco-system. Energy policy has become industry policy and now it is also becoming an important part of security policy. To successfully deliver, we need the European ecosystem to ensure that it gets better and better at the orchestration.

This interview is part of The Gazette's Autumn 2026 Special Report on Strategic Sectors and Industrial Policy. We thank Diederik Peereboom and the team at T&D Europe for their time and insights.

The Brief

Brussels, decoded, every morning. What happened, what it means, one good dry joke.

Back to The Gazette →